Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND In 2002, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended colorectal cancer screening for adults 50 years of age or older but concluded that evidence was insufficient to prioritize among screening tests or evaluate newer tests, such as computed tomographic (CT) colonography. PURPOSE To review evidence related to knowledge gaps identified by the 2002 recommendation and to consider community performance of screening endoscopy, including harms. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, expert suggestions, and bibliographic reviews. STUDY SELECTION Eligible studies reported performance of colorectal cancer screening tests or health outcomes in average-risk populations and were at least of fair quality according to design-specific USPSTF criteria, as determined by 2 reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers verified extracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS Four fecal immunochemical tests have superior sensitivity (range, 61% to 91%), and some have similar specificity (97% to 98%), to the Hemoccult II fecal occult blood test (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California). Tradeoffs between superior sensitivity and reduced specificity occur with high-sensitivity guaiac tests and fecal DNA, with other important uncertainties for fecal DNA. In settings with sufficient quality control, CT colonography is as sensitive as colonoscopy for large adenomas and colorectal cancer. Uncertainties remain for smaller polyps and frequency of colonoscopy referral. We did not find good estimates of community endoscopy accuracy; serious harms occur in 2.8 per 1000 screening colonoscopies and are 10-fold less common with flexible sigmoidoscopy. LIMITATION The accuracy and harms of screening tests were reviewed after only a single application. CONCLUSION Fecal tests with better sensitivity and similar specificity are reasonable substitutes for traditional fecal occult blood testing, although modeling may be needed to determine all tradeoffs. Computed tomographic colonography seems as likely as colonoscopy to detect lesions 10 mm or greater but may be less sensitive for smaller adenomas. Potential radiation-related harms, the effect of extracolonic findings, and the accuracy of test performance of CT colonography in community settings remain uncertain. Emphasis on quality standards is important for implementing any operator-dependent colorectal cancer screening test.
منابع مشابه
Methods for conducting systematic reviews of evidence on effectiveness and economic efficiency of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.
he Task Force on Community Preventive Ser vices (Task Force) chose to include prevention of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer hrough interventions to increase screening as a topic n the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Commun uide) for several reasons. First, these cancers impose a arge health burden on the U.S. population; second, here are effective screening tests that can reduc...
متن کاملScreening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. An examination of the evidence.
In October 2011, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF, or "Task Force") released draft recommendations on prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), concluding that "PSA-based screening results in small or no reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality and is associated with harms related to subsequent evaluation and treatments, some of which may be unnecessa...
متن کاملAnnouncement: Community Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations for Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening
The Community Preventive Services Task Force recently posted on its website new information regarding recommendations for multicomponent interventions for three different cancers: 1) “Increasing Cancer Screening: Multicomponent Interventions — Breast Cancer,” https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/cancer-screening-multicomponentinterventions-breast-cancer; 2) “Increasing Cancer Screening: M...
متن کاملScreening for testicular cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.
DESCRIPTION Reaffirmation of the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement on screening for testicular cancer. METHODS The USPSTF performed a targeted literature search for benefits and harms of screening for testicular cancer in asymptomatic males and found no new studies. RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF does not recommend screening for testicular cancer in asymp...
متن کاملRecommendations for client- and provider-directed interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.
ancer is the leading cause of death for all people in the U.S. under the age of 65 and the second leading cause of death for people of all ages. ffective screening tests for breast, colorectal, and ervical cancers can prevent cancer-related mortalty. Yet, despite many years of past improvement, olorectal cancer screening rates remain below exected levels, breast cancer screening may be on the e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of internal medicine
دوره 149 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008